Soft-porn
Poff

| |
Too
much style IS a bad thing. by
Jon Dunmore © Dec 2004. Despite
the consensus that Cameron Diaz wantonly proffering her backside like a baboon
in estrus makes for good cinema, my existence would be incalculably enhanced if
I never witness this repulsive rectal display cloaked in ostensible good-natured
humor ever again in my short span on this earth. CHARLIE'S ANGELS: FULL THROTTLE is so plastic, it hurt my teeth. There is a plot somewhere, but they forgot to film it. There is a movie somewhere amidst all the explosions and over-lighting and inane dialog, but everyone forgot to act in it.
Which
boat did I miss? Why are these puerile, cardboard doxies regarded as screen goddesses?;
heroines for an arse-tattooed generation of over-fed, class-less, prepubescent,
poorly-educated future streetwalkers? The just-plain-ugly Lucy Liu, the matron-plump,
lisping, graceless Drew Barrymore and the flat-plastic Cameron Diaz, who's idiot-grinning
and asinine booty-shaking every ten minutes reaches stratospheric ludicrousness
unequaled by the worst Ed Wood or Godzilla movie. None of these tarts is in the
least appealing to me as a procreative heterosexual male.
The Hammer
dance? And all that imbecilic giggling? Only minimum-wage flunkies slaving over
fast-food counters and born-again christians exhibit such a surfeit of fake sincerity.
Either stop all that laughing and hugging on the couch - or continue along this
pornographic thread that you yourselves have instigated - and give us a payoff.
But at PG-13, as long as there are no swear words, simply insert as much lewd
innuendo as possible and slide it past the feeble-minded censorship board. Over-riding
my desire to slap these three emasculating shrikes was the yearning to cudgel
every half-wit who greenlighted, funded, created and marketed this monstrous cinematic
trash which, due to its distribution budget, has ingrained itself deeper into
the world culture than the name of penicillin's discoverer. (-Alexander Fleming,
on the off-chance you can tear your eyes from Diaz's baboon rectum on display
yet again.) The
unsophisticates may opine: "But it's all in fun - it's entertainment!"
Well, so is overdosing on heroin, which is what this film's barf-inducing action
sequences resemble. The opening scene, in which the Angels run a truck carrying
a helicopter off a bridge and then climb into the helicopter and fire its ignition
and fly off (all within a 100-foot drop to a river) is enough to discern that
this movie is definitively purely for the plastic popcorn and cardboard hot dog
brigade (i.e. the swell of the bell-curve of movie-going audiences who have no
discernment - for cuisine or film-making). And the Great Unwashed rise
up in indignation, unwilling to be classified as bovine enough to be deceived
into paying to be exploited - yet - how else did a movie aiming for low intelligence
ever manage to make the amount of money it extracted from the viewing public?
The
paradox: Director McG's target demographic (4 to 7 year olds with an attention
span no greater than 12 seconds exactly - the longest interval of time which ever
elapses in this movie without an over-tweaked explosion, unrealistic wire stunt,
CGI-drenched "action" sequence, irrelevant slomo passage, or gratuitous
soft-porn allusion) will never have the perception to fathom the musical and visual
cultural references which the movie is bloated with: The Sound Of Music, KC &
The Sunshine Band, The Pink Panther, Flashdance, the Cape Fear remake, etc. Almost
every sequence becomes a wink to the audience, as McG gets swallowed by his own
anus by trying way too hard to impress upon his viewers that he's in on these
gags as well. His groveling as a sycophant far outweighs his talents as a film-maker.
Did
anyone else notice the 20 million watts of obvious stage lighting on all characters
all the time especially when they're out in the sunlight and they don't
need it? Are we to consider that these hounds are so freakin' beautiful that
we wouldn't want to miss one inch of their bootylicious backsides or frontsides
in realistic shadow? And
speaking of bootylicious frontsides, the ab-crunched, testosterone-drenched Demi
Moore appears in the movie solely to display her nakedness to Ashton Kutcher's
jealous mates in a socially-acceptable forum. Lord knows, she'll never actually
deign to ever visit a beach to do so - if you think these Hollywood starlets
get their all-over tans by gadding about in natural sunshine, you must also believe
that any film with over seven explosions in its 30-second trailer is a movie worth
seeing. John
Cleese is the film's only saving grace (along with Bruce Willis' 30-second cameo),
but Cleese's screentime is diluted by his interaction with the mannequin Matt
LeBlanc. LeBlanc should be thanking his goat-headed gods that he actually got
the opportunity to even stand alongside the icon Cleese, let alone share
screentime with him. The downside to appearing alongside Cleese was, of course,
that it proved beyond a doubt that Matt LeBlanc isn't really an actor. Or funny.
Or ever has been. And should probably be put out of his misery like the hoss that
he is.
A
lot of sugar went into making this sour ipecac seem sweet. If I could just
purloin one god-given opportunity to wrap my fingers around their collective throats,
I'd illustrate the proper method to execute a FULL THROTTLE.
END |
|