The
Antisocial Truth behind the Socially-Acceptable Fiction.
by Jon Dunmore © 19 Mar 2001.
THE SOPRANOS leans
heavily on Freud. And I'm a Freud kinda guy (over a Jung kinda
guy - as I am
a Nietzsche Kinda Guy over a Kant Kinda Guy - and no, I did
not appreciate the shot at Nietzsche in Episode 20 ("D-Girl"),
"Nietzsche wound up talkin' to his horse"). Freud
postulated that, among other things, dreams are a form of
"wish-fulfillment" - and this Episode 30 conveyed
that aspect in layered spades.
The popularity of THE SOPRANOS stems from its wild truthfulness - even if that truth flies in the face of political correctness. In this episode, psychiatrist Jennifer Melfi (Lorraine Bracco) is raped, and contemplates turning to a force that she knows can wreak awesome revenge for her - Tony Soprano.
When The Law feebly admits its impotence in bringing the rapist to "justice," we are all confronted with that naked truth that Justice is truly only a euphemism for Revenge. (We
feel justice has been done only when the level of retribution
has sated our desire for revenge.)
THE SOPRANOS originally staked its premise on the anti-socialism
of its protagonist, Tony Soprano (James Gandolfini), and his attempts to 'better
himself' through society's prescribed means of cure - psychiatry. Though
the humor in this concept was not lost upon us, the incongruity
touched a deeper vein of introspectiveness. We were constantly
called upon to ask ourselves, "IS this man irredeemable?
If so, 'irredeemable' from whose point of view? And if he
IS incorrigible, can ANY form of prescribed cure work for
him? And if none can, why do we continue to watch this futile
exercise with such a surfeit of lascivious pleasure?"
This episode, more than any before it, brought forth that
hypocritical paradox that Society must face every single
day of its 'civilized' life: though it tries to suppress
(read as the euphemism 'heal') all those who supposedly
cannot control their violent/primal impulses, ultimately
it would like to be able to address its issues AS DIRECTLY
AS a person in Tony's world addresses his,
without having to analyze and repress emotions.
And that's why we all marvel, mouths agape, at the intensity
of Truth encapsulated within the framework of this fiction.
As
Melfi was spouting non-PC retribution against her malefactor,
venting to her own psychiatrist, we are forced to assess our own inculcated morals. Only now
can those in Melfi's insular caste understand
the measures that must be taken - and why those measures
need to be taken - in certain circumstances. If it only
seemed like a worn cliché before, now Society in
Melfi's echelon can truly comprehend what Tony and his ilk
mean when they say, "This thing of ours - it's a thing of honor."
Melfi's son, Jason, understood - as all humans do in their reptilian brains - that the only honorable
thing is grim retribution. But 'civilization'
has decreed dysfunction on all those who would act impulsively.
Why? (As Tony once said, "cos if dey got Gary Cooper
in touch wid his feelin's, then it's dysfunction dis an'
dysfunction dat and dysfunction buh fungul!--" ) At first, Jason is made to look anti-socially impulsive - but after Melfi fell victim to The Law's callous handling
of her case (the rapist was captured and
subsequently allowed to walk on a technicality), both Melfi and we are shocked into realizing that Jason was right.
No
Repression, No Dysfunction, No Therapy Required.
Ironic
that Melfi's epiphany of how violence can be used to solve
psychological noxae should come in the form of violence
visited upon her person. Now she realizes how ultimately
cogent Tony's world view is, in relation to her fragile,
sheltered existence.
She
dreams of a ferocious black dog that threatens her while
her hand is caught in a vending machine. Though fearful
of it, in her dream, she was suddenly confronted by a greater
peril - her rapist, whom the black dog attacked. It was
obvious that the dog represented Tony Soprano: a fearful
presence, yet with the potential to protect and avenge her.
Public perception of The Law is along these same
lines, yet Melfi realizes that althogh it looks like it's there to protect/avenge
wrongdoing, ultimately, through bureaucracy, injustice and inefficiency,
it ends up stultifying and destroying what it has been instituted
to preserve.
Melfi
wanted Tony out of her life because she did not want to
get drawn into his world - but after the rape, she wants
him as close as ever because his world exists, and
she has been jarred into realizing the benefits of that world.
After
spending the last few years vicariously drawing titillation
from Tony's proximity (and, by association, her proximity
to the underworld), Melfi now comprehends exactly how wondrously
violent Tony's world must really be. And she senses, more
than ever, his potency. She now knows that the element that
wounded her so nonchalantly could just as nonchalantly be
decimated through the power that this man wields so comfortably.
One word from her to him - and her assailant would be nonexistent.
Yet she cannot bring herself to unleash that power because
she realizes how all-consuming it will be. Once tasted,
like heroin, she would crave that taste again and again.
No indiscretion would become too small for her to avenge.
Her fate, her mind, her body, would all become Tony's possessions
were she to "ask a favor" of him.
In assessing the strength it requires to AVOID acting upon
every impulse, Melfi now also realizes just how powerful
this man is, in refraining from those acts which
he could accomplish so very easily.
Lorraine Bracco scaled new heights in her portrayal of this
character whom we thought had attained a ceiling of complexity.
Her turmoil was incredible to witness. Her character
ultimately had to concede that since she had relinquished
her will to the beast of Civilized Society, she could never
set foot on that dark road that Tony stands upon, where
he waits for the slightest sign from her, to lead her down
it.
The
episode's last lines were like thunderheads, as Tony asks,
"Is there somethin' you wanna say to me?" and
Melfi pauses, then replies with a soul-empty, "No." Cut to
Black.
END
|
|