Lt.
Commander Porf
|
|
Where
Girlfriends Fear To Tread
by
Jon Dunmore © 25 Feb 2006.
You
need not watch Trekkies to understand Trekkies 2.
No sense in hurting your intelligence lobe twice in the same
area.
Where
Trekkies (1997) examined the extreme depths American
Star Trek fanatics plumb in their quest to creep out their
more sane human counterparts, Trekkies 2 does the
same thing abroad.
And
what a broad. Denise Crosby, our docu-movie's globe-trotting
host and executive producer (and Tasha Yar from Star
Trek: The Next Generation) apparently only owns t-shirts
two sizes too small for her straining bust - which is perfectly
congruent with the effect she creates with her audience,
as I discovered that in staring at her scientifically over-proportioned
chest and its obvious anti-grav facility, my PANTS suddenly
feel two sizes too small for my straining thighs.
Paying
absolutely no attention to this film (for fear of finding
sense in its senseless enterprise), I can only briefly outline
its thrust: Crosby uncomfortably interviews Trek geeks
from Euro nations - proving conclusively that even in Sweden,
there is a Deep South - then catches up with many of the
U.S. übergeeks from the original Trekkies, ostensibly
to see how they've, uh, progressed, but ultimately just
to laugh at them again.
Bringing
her breasts to bear on pathetic man-boys more enamored with
their toy collection than her mountainous mammaries proffered
like Trek-alicious casabas at a Hawaiian luau, Crosby's
barely-hidden contempt for her interviewees is what creates
the uncomfortable air, as none of the uniformed Star Fleeters
or Klingon undergraduates can perceive the irony or sarcasm
in her demeanor. At times, the pedestrian guilelessness
and witless naïveté is too painful to watch.
They may author whole texts on Klingon vernacular or starship
design, yet their grasp of human behavior has not
developed past the third grade.
Take,
for example, the silly shrike from Trekkies (Barbara
Adams) who arrived for jury duty wearing her Star Fleet
uniform, insisting she was "a Federation officer 24
hours a day." (One would imagine that Federation officers
would receive adequate enough medical coverage to fix that
overbite, honey
) Trekkies 2 finds her even
more ensconced in her deranged fantasy, with the gutless,
politically-correct populace humoring her at her office
job, then backing away slowly with fake smiles. In a more
sensible era, she'd be either flinging herself against a
padded wall in a straitjacket or smartly recanting her delusions
when she saw the men in white approaching her with said
jacket.
Then
there's young Gabriel Köerner, for whom we can summon
a modicum of respect, as he has parlayed his obsessive fascination
with Star Trek effects design (as seen in Trekkies)
into an actual career (at this date, having worked on The
Day After Tomorrow, Enterprise, Lost and Battlestar
Galactica). His marriage (you heard me right: MARRIAGE
- to a woman of the female gender, even), though not making
him any less geeky, has nonetheless given hope to 35-year-old
Trek-Virgins everywhere.
Though
the raison d'être of these films is ostensibly
to pay homage to the Trek fan's obsession, presenting such
a glut of geek-cheese is actually detrimental to the cause.
Hammering the viewer with doofus after doofus is no way
to endear the cult to the general populace. A fan lets slip
his inner dweeb at a smalltown Trek convention in Trekkies,
"It started off small and now younger people are coming.
This year, we had a girl come and everything." (Verbatim.)
At least Trekkies 2 actually sports some hot chicks!
For this reason alone, it is miles above Trekkies.
Not that "hot chicks" are any kind of yardstick
for intelligence, but their presence portends a more balanced
lifestyle for the geeks and presents a more balanced perception
for viewers.
But
the sad fact is, these obsessive-compulsives do not simply
flatter their heroes through imitation. Unlike Köerner,
few of them ever parlay their talents into any of the professional
fields associated with the Trek universe (entertainment,
science, graphic design, catering, lighting, carpentry,
aeronautics, etc.). Most of them are all-too-obviously addicts
channeling their compulsions into this particular avocation,
as opposed to drink, drugs, kleptomania or porn. And the
truth is, when pastimes/diversions attain the level of addiction
displayed by some of the more notorious fanatics that the
Trekkies movies highlight, it can only be detrimental
to one's physical and intellectual well-being.
As
examples of physical detriment, take the cast of "filk"
singers at Leslie Fish's gathering; a busload of people
whom we'd have a hard time convincing ourselves needed saving
if teetering over a cliff. Not that being "ugly"
or "undesirable" is a bad thing - it can't be
helped - but just as extremely beautiful people assume a
certain mind-set, so too does the other end of the spectrum,
ostracized in subtle and sometimes blatant ways by the good-looking
contingent, their personality traits eventually reflecting
their perceived segregation, skewing their self-esteem and
self-image. This has nothing to do with political correctness
- it is a Nature/Nurture issue. Yes, feel sorry for them.
Like any anonymous alcoholic, they need our help
This
makes over-privileged, enabled Denise Crosby's intrusion
into this Trek culture even more obvious as an opportunity
to exploit these nudniks for profit. How would this smoking-hot
model (who is Bing Crosby's granddaughter, no less) ever
hope to get into the mind of this underprivileged caste
she feels no affinity towards? It is a case of simply rolling
camera - and out of the mouths of nerds the movie shapes
itself. Hilarity ensues. Tenuously related to them by her
small involvement in the series of their worship, Crosby
does not and cannot attempt any in-depth comprehension of
their psychoses. She can only look on with a smile as fake
as her boobs. Which says something damaging about the psyche
and ethics of over-privileged, enabled, superstar children
- but that's another essay...
Intellectually,
Trekkies are determined to illustrate their ignorance in
lauding the "science" in Trek. Well, if
there was any science at all utilized in the Trek canon,
I'd have grounds to retort - since there is NONE, I'll just
back away slowly with fake smile.
And
the grandest idiocy of all, rationalizing the reasons behind
the cult's popularity: "Star Trek has great MESSAGES!"
"We could all learn from the VALUES that Trek
promotes."
As
I recall, there were valuable messages to be learned from
The Brady Bunch as well: "Mom said don't play
ball in the house!" "Caveat Emptor: Let the Buyer
Beware," and especially noteworthy, when Mike Brady
advised Greg, "You can't fight City Hall," and
Greg replied, "Oh yes you can, Dad! Oh yes you can!"
Power to the People - that was what Greg Brady was ALL ABOUT!
Bring me my big-collared shirts and bellbottoms from the
closet and let me just get my white-fro perm on. To show
my two-fisted support of The Brady Messages, of course -
not because I'm a loon with no life or girlfriend.
END
|
|