Movies should make you think; at the very least, entertain. Ironically, that’s why RELIGULOUS fails. We who already “think” have weighed the evidence and know the truth about the lie of religion (therefore, this movie is not making us think any more than we already do – and as “entertainment,” it’s frustrating), whereas those who don’t think – mired in the muck of worshipping fake entities – won’t be inspired to think by this media or any other logic-based arguments, and would also be frustrated that they are portrayed as such intellectual rednecks by the film, which of course, they are…Hence, RELIGULOUS becomes just another preach to just another choir.
Creator of RELIGULOUS, political commentator, Bill Maher, is a super-comedian in the mold of Lenny Bruce and George Carlin – using satire to bludgeon societal stupidity. Religion is a major stupidity that I love this man for bludgeoning.
RELIGULOUS starts where it’s all going to end: Megiddo. Maher stands in a rubble pit in Israel, where the Book of Revelation foretells the End Times.
“If it’s one thing I hate more than prophecy, it’s self-fulfilling prophecy.”
Maher interviews scores of people across the globe, from southern U.S. hillbillies, to European religious professors, from ex-Jews for Jesus, to Hasidic Jewish elders; from Islamic leaders to excommunicated Mormons; from Italian Catholic dissident priests to a Muslim gay bar in Amsterdam. An evangelist tells Maher: “Faith has a way of softening people” (obviously hasn’t read about the last five thousand years of religious wars); when Maher asks a senator, “Surely you don’t believe in a talking snake?” the gullible senator’s reply (which should scare to hell everyone in his state), “You don’t have to pass an IQ test to be a senator.” One thing becomes strikingly apparent about Maher that cannot be said about the “holy” and “ordained” and “theological” people he meets – he knows his bible.
RELIGULOUS is BORAT-meets-Christopher Hitchens – dumbasses abound, given enough rope to hang themselves at the Tyburn Tree of intellectualism. Reminds us of the TREKKIES movies, where the entertainment value stems from the fanatics just being their bad selves.
Maher uses religious and pop culture media in snippets sprinkled liberally, to temper the supposed theological gravitas of his interviewees (like TV’s DREAM ON used to punctuate gags or irony), but these snippets are gravy, as most of these lollygaggers unintentionally temper their somberness with their own religious ignorance.
Some of the interviews are laugh out loud: meeting with Jose Jesus Miranda, of the Growing in Grace Ministry, who maintains he is the actual descendant of Jesus: “Yes, I am the Second Coming. There’s David, then Jesus, then me”; the scientist who claims, “There were eyewitnesses [to the bible writings],” who, upon being pushed by Maher (“Oh, come on! There were no eyewitnesses!”), backpedals, “They were close to that, a couple of decades.” Some “scientist”!; the Exchange Ministry, run by an ex-gay guy who considers himself never to have been gay, “just lost for awhile”.
Maher: “So many people try to make it something good, but it turns into fucking-little-kids corrupt and burning people alive.”
A Muslim leader tells Maher, “Islam means peace,” which Maher juxtaposes with visuals and statistics of Middle Eastern war. (The Arabic root “salema” or “salaama” may mean “peace, purity, submission and obedience,” but in religious context, Islam means “submission to the will of God and obedience to His law.” Subtle difference, Religious Scholar Guy.) Cue endless war with infidels.
Meeting a group of stereotypical rednecks (the type with velvet pictures of Jesus hanging in their bathrooms) in their small local church/garage, one of them protests he doesn’t like the direction of Maher’s questions and walks out (of course, this protester is 400 lbs, speaks with an accent that sounds like he should be axe-murdering in Alabama, and has probably never read two pages of the bible back to back for lack of literacy), while another of the hick congregation admits to being a former Satanist preacher…
In Jerusalem, the muslims Maher interviews cannot even agree on the story regarding a holy area, let alone where the boundaries of that prescribed “holy area” begin.
It is all Maher can do not to raise his eyes to a nonexistent heaven and beseech a nonexistent god for patience. Or another punchline.
With his questioning, Maher seeks understanding of why people believe what they believe – usually finding blank-walled stupidity, obliviousness, misinformation, illiteracy, self-denial and downright imbecility. What scares and concerns Maher is finding Certainty: Certainty about being “chosen” people, Certainty about existence after death, Certainty in uneducated belligerence that your beliefs are “right”… With Certainty, comes a closing of the mind – nothing else can infiltrate if you believe you’ve identified an eternal truth.
Maher notes: While the other guys are selling Certainty, he promotes Doubt – the only way to actually seek truth, be it transitional or eternal.
And let’s face it: People who need religion as a reason to be good to other people, well – what kind of people are they?
In the earlier stages of the film, Maher puts the sense in common sense, trying to reason with fanatics who believe in “miracles” like “asking God for rain and having it rain” – as the film progresses, though, he gives up on these maniacs and joyously takes the piss out of everyone.
By the time we arrive at the Creation Museum, we’re on the Straight Piss Express.
Some critics remark on Maher’s condescending attitude as an atheist. I guess the last few thousand years of religious condescension toward atheists doesn’t count. And Bill Maher has every right to be condescending because he is not an uninformed soapboxer (he actually joins the loonies at Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park, London, bluntly describing the tenets of Scientology – and sounds every bit as loony as Scientologists themselves); he is intellectually armed and battle-ready, and – this may come as a surprise after millennia of condescension – Maher and the rest of Us Atheists know something that Religions don’t: we are right.
The Founding Fathers say so. For those who lean on the bedrock ideals of the U.S., Maher points out that Jefferson, Washington et al realized something that modern politicians gutlessly choose to neglect – separation of church and state. All those guys on Rushmore were ATHEISTS! If they had the slightest inclination toward christianity, they had the good sense never to bring their superstitious fantasies into the Oval Egg. “Christianity and Nationalism should be completely incompatible, instead ‘God and country’ is everywhere linked.”
Surprisingly, the only people who display a modicum of good sense in RELIGULOUS are Catholics! After being kicked out of the Vatican, literally, Maher interviews a Vatican astronomer (which is almost an oxymoron, considering most christians believe the universe revolves around Earth), who freely admits that even Pope John Paul II said “Evolution is accepted by the Catholic Church” – an intelligent, lucid, open-minded scientist (which makes it all the harder to understand why he believes in the non-evidential god) who talks of Jesus’ christmas birth date established approximately 349 A.D. Hmm… with such knowledge, should this guy really be a priest?
Ironically, Maher ends on a preachy note, “Religion must die for Mankind to live.” It’s true, of course, though it probably won’t be so cut-and-dry when it happens. Zeus and Thor and Venus took thousands of years to sink into the mists of legend. How long will it take Jesus and Mohammed and Joseph Smith?
To help them along into oblivion, let’s do a thought experiment; a Maxwell’s Demon scenario – call ME “God.” Channel your belief from an unseen, unheard, unfelt deity… to ME. You’ll see the same results from your prayers and devotion as you would with your guy in the sky. For example, if you wanted to arrive safely, and you originally called on Him to provide that safety, now call on me instead. If you have a safe trip, I “answered your prayers”; if you have an accident, then I “am testing you.” When it rains, attribute it to me, and when the sun shines, you can believe I caused that too (and yes, it IS shining out of my arse); when a volcano erupts and kills thousands, you can blame me – but don’t judge me. It is My Will and I work in MYSTERIOUS WAYS…
Belief in GOD? Belief in ME? Exactly the same results.
Read my full rant here: CALL ME GOD (and I’ll still respect you in the morning).
What message can we atheists derive from RELIGULOUS, besides the obvious dead-horse-flogging? We get it that RELIG(ion is ridic)ULOUS, so what more preach can he sling at this choir?
Maher says it loud and proud: Stand up for what we DON’T believe in!
Maher entreats atheists to be not afraid of our affiliation, pointing out that atheists are 16% of the American population, noting that smaller contingencies boast stronger lobbying groups, such as the gay population. With such a large percentage, fear not the mongol hordes of religionistas and their Machiavellian ignorance and hate-mongering. Stand firm on our platform: REALITY.
And I would add to that: DO IT. It’s not as hard as you think. I’ve been starkly forthright about my atheism over the past decade, going so far as to correct people when they ask for my “christian” name. Don’t they all just relish wallowing in the syrup of taking it for granted we’re all part of their fantasy? “Christian” name implies a far-fetched “belief” in Christ. I have merely a FIRST name, spank you very much: Poffy.
But you can call me God.